.block { position:relative; // This is important background-color:#FFFFFF; padding:24px; line-height:24px; bottom: -50%; // This is important transform: translateY(-50px); // This is important width: 60%; border-radius: 5px; margin: 0 auto; // Only if you need to be centered }
Back To Resources

Towards a sociological critique of the normalisation principle

Written Material

An extensive critique, Chappell's central argument is normalisation is a professional- centred theory concerning itself largely with quality in services, therefore working through existing structures rather than challenging them. Following from and adding to this, she argues that the theory does not problematise the relationship between professional and service user (one of power and conflicting interests). Thirdly she argues that because the theory is situated firmly in the world of ideas it fails to take into account material constraints imposed upon people with intellectual disabilities. Lastly, it is argued that normalisation takes as given that 'disability' is located in the physical or intellectual impairments an individual may possess, rather than the notion of 'disability' itself being socially constructed. The most interesting part of the article is Chappell's belief that 'disability' itself has not been extensively theorised. Because of this the normalisation principle has remained the dominant theory despite its weaknesses. Keyword: Theory

Check Out Item Request

Author
Chappell, Anne Louise
Source
Disability, Handicap and Society, Volume 7 Number 1
Publisher
-
Publication Date
Category
Professionals
Keywords
Theory
Origin

© 2015 - 2019 Family Advocacy. Site by Internetrix.